Evaluative Research

What is it? Evaluative research is an umbrella term for studies in which participants are “evaluating” something such as a storyboard, video, sketch, packaging, a question set, prototype or even a fully developed live product, service or interface. 

Evaluative research first entails a clear understanding of what is being evaluated and the criteria it is being evaluated against. It requires something that exists in a format where people can provide feedback on it. Once the criteria (e.g. preference, comprehension, usability, discoverability, product market fit, etc.) have been determined, the study is designed and conducted to be measured against the agreed upon assessment criteria of the study. 

When is it best used? Generally conducted at several different times in a product development lifecycle, each time feeding back learnings into the next or subsequent iteration during the evolution of the product or service. It could equally be used to evaluate the performance of an existing product, service, website and or app

What does it entail? Approaches may include moderated or unmoderated studies, observation, qualitative and / or quantitative methods. Examples include click testing, A/B tests, 5-second tests, concept/prototype and preferences tests, usability studies, taste tests, voice recognition testing, competitive and workflow analysis, surveys, as well as other methods, may all fall under the category of evaluative research.  

Interchangeable term:  Formative usability testing, validation research, concept testing and other terms used above 

Related Terms: usability testing, validation research, concept testing, formative and summative research

Use in a Sentence: During the evaluative research session, the interviewee completed tasks on a high fidelity mockup to inform whether the top tasks were easy to complete.

Additional Resources

Articles




Share this page


ADDITIONAL RESOURCES FROM CURIOSITY TANK

 

What is UX Lex?

An evolving, interactive glossary of UX research terms.

It's ironic. Those of us who work in UX, user researchers included, aspire to create terrific user experiences. That’s what we do. But what we have done with our own terminology is to create a mess. Eighty UXers from around the globe began to address that problem in September 2019. Here is a sneak peek of that work. More details, and full credits, to come. Sign up here to get weekly terms in your inbox >>


Looking to get involved? Great!

Enormous accolades to the dozens of people who have already contributed to this work.

We are actively looking for people to support this initiative!

Share feedback on these definitions and any terms we may be missing. Learn about project sponsorship and advertising.

Have another idea or question? Great! Send us a note.

Previous
Previous

Empathy Mapping

Next
Next

Finding